RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are high rates of comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and opioid use disorder (OUD). Evidence-based trauma-focused psychotherapies such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) are a first-line treatment for PTSD. Veterans with OUD are treated primarily in substance use disorder (SUD) clinics where the standard of care is drug counseling; they often do not have access to first-line PTSD treatments. This study tested whether CPT can be conducted safely and effectively in veterans with comorbid OUD treated with buprenorphine. METHODS: This 12-week, 2-site, randomized clinical trial (RCT) included open-label randomization to two groups: (a) CPT versus (b) Individual Drug Counselling (IDC) in veterans with PTSD and comorbid OUD who were maintained on buprenorphine (N = 38). RESULTS: Veterans randomized to either IDC (n = 18) or CPT (n = 20) showed a significant reduction in self-reported PTSD symptoms over time as measured by the PTSD checklist (PCL-5) but there were no treatment group differences; there was some indication that reduction in PTSD symptoms in the CPT group were sustained in contrast to the IDC group. Recruitment was significantly impacted by COVID-19 pandemic, so this study serves as a proof-of-concept pilot study. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with OUD and PTSD can safely and effectively participate in evidence-based therapy for PTSD; further work should confirm that trauma-focused treatment may be more effective in leading to sustained remission of PTSD symptoms than drug counseling. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to evaluate CPT for PTSD in the context of buprenorphine treatment for OUD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the declining prevalence of cigarette smoking in the United States, socioeconomically disadvantaged veterans receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration have a high prevalence of smoking. Currently, available treatment options for these veterans focus on tobacco users who are ready to quit and have limited reach. Consequently, there is a great need for accessible, effective smoking cessation interventions for veterans at all levels of readiness to quit smoking. OBJECTIVE: To address these needs, we developed Vet Flexiquit, a web-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy program for veterans, and evaluated its acceptability (primary aim), efficacy, and impact on theory-based change processes relative to the National Cancer Institute's SmokefreeVET program in a pilot randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants (N=49) were randomized 1:1 to receive either the Vet Flexiquit (n=25) or SmokefreeVET (n=24) web program. Both groups received SMS text messages as part of the intervention for 6 weeks. Both interventions are fully automated and self-guided. Primary outcome data were collected at 3 months after the randomization. Self-reported smoking abstinence was biochemically verified using saliva cotinine. Multivariable logistic regression, negative binomial regression, and linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between the treatment arm and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Acceptability, as measured by overall treatment satisfaction, was high and similar across treatment arms: 100% (17/17) for Vet Flexiquit and 95% (18/19) for SmokefreeVET. Acceptability, as measured by utilization, was more modest (log-ins: M=3.7 for Vet Flexiquit and M=3.2 for SmokefreeVET). There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms for any acceptability measures. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in the secondary outcomes of smoking cessation or change in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy's theory-based processes. In open-ended survey responses, some veterans in both treatment arms expressed interest in having support from a professional or peer to enhance their experience, as well as an expanded SMS text messaging program. CONCLUSIONS: Both programs had high ratings of acceptability, limited utilization, and a similar impact on cessation and cessation processes. Taken together with the qualitative data suggesting that additional support may enhance participants' experience of both programs, these preliminary findings suggest that the programs may have similar outcomes among veterans who are looking for a digital cessation treatment option and that integrating provider or peer support and enhancing the SMS text messaging program holds promise as a means of boosting engagement and outcomes for both programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04502524; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04502524.
RESUMEN
During the COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation was a common experience as people were trying to keep themselves and others safe from infection. Veterans with problematic substance use are at particular risk of the consequences of social isolation. This study evaluated the nature of social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of loneliness and psychological flexibility on self-reported substance use and physical and mental health functioning among U.S. veterans who reported problematic substance use. Data from 409 veterans with self-reported substance use concerns were obtained via a cross-sectional online survey. Results showed that many veterans who engaged in problematic substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic reported a number of social supports during this period and frequent communication with others, but still felt lonelier during the pandemic. In regression analyses, higher levels of loneliness were associated with more negative impacts of the pandemic, greater substance use, and poorer physical and mental health functioning. Psychological flexibility demonstrated significant unique variance in explaining mental health functioning during the pandemic after accounting for loneliness, but not for substance use or physical functioning. For veterans with high levels of loneliness, high levels of psychological flexibility were associated with a lower negative impact on quality of life due to the pandemic, but for veterans with low levels of loneliness, differing levels of psychological flexibility were not significantly associated with the negative impact of COVID-19. Overall, loneliness and psychological flexibility appear to be highly associated with the negative impact of COVID-19 on veterans with problematic substance use.
